|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 10 post(s) |

Omnathious Deninard
Novis Initiis
2608
|
Posted - 2014.12.19 11:37:10 -
[1] - Quote
TuCZnak wrote:CCP Rise wrote:Dscan immunity is staying.Thanks for all the feedback. I don't think you value feedback that much, because most of this thread is a really big backlash against this "improvement". Anyway, if the immunity is staying, my subscriptions in your game are not staying, you can be sure about that. Can I have your stuff? |

Omnathious Deninard
Novis Initiis
2614
|
Posted - 2014.12.19 23:24:41 -
[2] - Quote
Caldari 5 wrote:Wow I hadn't looked at F&ID in a couple of days and all of a sudden massive thread on Recons. Haven't read the thread yet, but have read the blue posts.
CCP Rise any chance of adding the PvE bonus for Virus Strength to the Covert Recons? I had mentioned this to you in person at Eve Down Under. I don't see why it has to be only covert recons?
I agree that it would be nice to see them get a +10 virus strength for hacking |

Omnathious Deninard
Novis Initiis
2624
|
Posted - 2014.12.22 14:18:31 -
[3] - Quote
CCP Rise wrote:Monday update - I'm working on a revised proposal but it's a bit slow going with everyone but me out of the office to visit their families (boring). Hopefully some new stuff for you guys soon. We might be a large group of loud, sometimes rude, bitter vets but we are here with you. |

Omnathious Deninard
Novis Initiis
2624
|
Posted - 2014.12.22 17:44:07 -
[4] - Quote
Marlona Sky wrote:Just don't forget the cancer that is ultra easy and effort free perfect intel. It results in far less fights. If not appearing on the directional scanner is not an option, then perhaps not appearing in local chat is. And don't worry about those nullbears, everyone has intel channels and of course the d-scan. If they are proactive in gathering intel for a change, then combat recons will not be the END OF DAYS as some are saying. Don't give in to the fear mongering! TBH I would much rather them disappear from local than D-Scan.
D-Scan is a legitimate intelligence tool, local chat is abused into a resource tool.
Don't make ships ignore legit intel and perpetuate local intel. |

Omnathious Deninard
Novis Initiis
2632
|
Posted - 2014.12.23 22:50:23 -
[5] - Quote
Losing the resists is disappointing, keeping the d-scan immunity gimmic seems questionable considering the amount to negative feedback it has received.
Careful with this change it seems to be treading the same water as loot spew, and we all know how that turned out. |

Omnathious Deninard
Novis Initiis
2633
|
Posted - 2014.12.24 12:03:18 -
[6] - Quote
Generaloberst Kluntz wrote:RISE Keep up the nice work The trail of tears shows you're in the right direction. So negative feedback means there doing something right? Ergo positive feedback means something is broken or OP and therefore is bad feedback.
This would mean the only valid feedback is inconclusive feedback which leads to running is circles.
To sum things up no feedback is best feedback. |

Omnathious Deninard
Novis Initiis
2638
|
Posted - 2014.12.25 04:16:33 -
[7] - Quote
FT Diomedes wrote:Yahrr wrote:Altirius Saldiaro wrote:...this is an MMO. There are thousands of other players in this game. Go find some friends, form up a fleet, and work together. Are you volunteering for watching one of the entrances to your wormhole location so the rest of the fleet can do it's thing, or do you recruit noobs for that? I'm asking this as this 'defending' will be much like mining, boring as hell and not worth Gé¼15 per month. It will be different in that you can't do it while watching youtube. So in the end it is about alts. There is a lovely program called OnTopReplica. Check it out. It's free. Basically, it allows you to view all or part of your Eve screen all the time. I generally stick my scouting alts on a gate, on a wormhole, or in a complex, then set up this program so I can view the overview portion of the scouts' screen at all times. If I see something show up on the screen, I alt tab over and take a closer look. It works really beautifully. It enables me to employ all my alts even with only two screens. It even works while you are watching Youtube videos. I know people hate being told to "bring friends" or "get an alt," but Eve is a complex game. One pilot cannot usually do everything necessary to ensure its own survival. That is a good thing. Insisting on solo, especially if you are an established player who can afford to PLEX an alt (or have a real job and some disposable income), is really stupid in an MMO. If you have a philosophical objection to alts, get some friends. When I was a new player, older players let me follow along while they ran missions. I got the loot and salvage, they got company. I'm sure you could find a way to make it worth someone's time to scout for you. Bring friends or get alts. Otherwise, please stop complaining. Point is things should not be balanced around bring an alt, because in all circumstances that what d-scan invisibility requires. No one is going to be willing to spen there night in a combat probing ship hitting scan every 10 seconds with a recon filter set. No one will be willin to sit at a WH waiting to tell others that a neutral has entered. |

Omnathious Deninard
Novis Initiis
2638
|
Posted - 2014.12.25 05:12:47 -
[8] - Quote
Rowells wrote:Omnathious Deninard wrote:FT Diomedes wrote:Bring friends or get alts. Otherwise, please stop complaining. Point is things should not be balanced around bring an alt, because in all circumstances that what d-scan invisibility requires. No one is going to be willing to spen there night in a combat probing ship hitting scan every 10 seconds with a recon filter set. No one will be willin to sit at a WH waiting to tell others that a neutral has entered. if you think we should balance gameplay around solo, you are in essence asking to nerf group gameplay. Why would you want that.? Not asking for group play to be nerfed, i am stating that things should not be introduced that all but require the use of an alt. |

Omnathious Deninard
Novis Initiis
2671
|
Posted - 2015.01.10 15:46:01 -
[9] - Quote
PastyWhiteDevil wrote:Gabriel Karade wrote:PastyWhiteDevil wrote: this is quite literally my favorite ship in game. please don't ruin it. lest we forget that roden favors MISSILES
The Roden missiles brain-bug has been stupid since the day it appeared. It's only taken like 5 years to get it squashed - now (as per my ancient 'Gallente Mk II' thread) at least there is some sense restored to the Gallente line: Duvolle - Blasters Roden - Railguns Creodron - Drones an un-damage-bonused rail lachesis is going to be absolute crap. secondly, weapon types are not split like that. it's hybrids, missiles, and drones. for example you don't have amarr ships that are considered to be pulse or beam laser. you have amarr laser ships, drone ships, and missile ships. the roden missile "brain-bug" needs to be expanded upon. give them the option to fit more missiles. I would love to see a missile ares -- it might actually be worth flying if you could missile fit it. CCP officially changed Rhiden to a rail based ship system. |
|
|
|